There are some limitations on what CiteGenie™ can do when presented with certain situations:

• The principle feature set of CiteGenie™ is for citing case law.  Citation of other sources such as law reviews and statutes, is not as advanced as the citation abilities for case law.
  
• CiteGenie™ can not make adjustments to capitalization in case names or article titles, so it will report then as it finds them.  For frequently found capitalization problems (such as a service using "Fec" for "FEC or "Federal Election Commission") you can add the correct form to your supplemental abbreviations, found on the Legal Citation Options" tab in the CiteGenie™ configuration.
  
• To be consistent with *-pagination, when a service does not have *-pagination for the first listed reporter, it should use **[page] to indicate the pinpoint is to the second reporter. When CiteGenie™ sees *[page], CiteGenie™ thinks it is for the first listed reporter when in fact, in some cases, the *[page] is for the second listed reporter.
  
• CiteGenie™ can not yet determine the author's name for law review articles.
  
• CiteGenie™ does not yet know the Bluebook name for all law reviews.
• CiteGenie™ does a good job at detecting en banc, concurring, and dissenting opinions, but that detection is not perfect.
• Party names for unions, cities, and in adversatial party bankruptcy cases are particularly difficult to process automatically, and will sometimes need to be corrected by hand.
  
• CiteGenie™ can not include subsequent writ history for Texas opinions, but does include the proper appellate court notion (including city/district)
  

You should also review the differences CiteGenie™ has between Westlaw and Lexis.